Обсуждение: JDO

Are there plans to add support for JDO (Java Data Objects)?

What support would be required from the driver?

Dave
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 19:56, John Pfersich wrote:
> Are there plans to add support for JDO (Java Data Objects)?
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
--
Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net>

Anyone knows of any plans of implementing the setCatalog method in
Connection?

Regards,
Patrik Lundgren

Patrik,

It is currently implemented.  Because of how postgres connections work,
setCatalog is a noop.  In postgres a connection connects to a specific
database.  There is no way that a connection can be repointed to a
different database (that would be a different connection).  So
setCatalog is implemented in the only way that is compatible with the
postgres architecture.

thanks,
--Barry


Patrik Lundgren wrote:
> Anyone knows of any plans of implementing the setCatalog method in
> Connection?
>
> Regards,
> Patrik Lundgren
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>

But when I use pgAdmin II I can administrate the different catalogs. Are
you saying that a different connection is created for each catalog?

Regards

--------------------------------------------

Patrik,

It is currently implemented.  Because of how postgres connections work,
setCatalog is a noop.  In postgres a connection connects to a specific
database.  There is no way that a connection can be repointed to a
different database (that would be a different connection).  So
setCatalog is implemented in the only way that is compatible with the
postgres architecture.

thanks,
--Barry


Patrik Lundgren wrote:
> Anyone knows of any plans of implementing the setCatalog method in
> Connection?
>
> Regards,
> Patrik Lundgren
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Yes, they connect to each catalog over a seperate conection.

Dave
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 16:04, Patrik Lundgren wrote:
> But when I use pgAdmin II I can administrate the different catalogs. Are
> you saying that a different connection is created for each catalog?
>
> Regards
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Patrik,
>
> It is currently implemented.  Because of how postgres connections work,
> setCatalog is a noop.  In postgres a connection connects to a specific
> database.  There is no way that a connection can be repointed to a
> different database (that would be a different connection).  So
> setCatalog is implemented in the only way that is compatible with the
> postgres architecture.
>
> thanks,
> --Barry
>
>
> Patrik Lundgren wrote:
> > Anyone knows of any plans of implementing the setCatalog method in
> > Connection?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Patrik Lundgren
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net>