Обсуждение: JDK development kit
Practical PostgreSQL pg. 12 The JDK is required by PostgreSQL if you ... Sun wanted to switch me to J2SE 1.4 But if I insist on JDK 1.1 I must choose between the Windows and Solaris versions. Using Linux, which of these is the lesser evil? Thanks, Warren _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Who said you needed to use jdk 1.1 ? You can use any one of them, including jdk 1.4 Dave On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 21:57, Warren Massengill wrote: > Practical PostgreSQL pg. 12 > The JDK is required by PostgreSQL if you ... > > Sun wanted to switch me to J2SE 1.4 > But if I insist on JDK 1.1 I must choose between the Windows and Solaris > versions. > > Using Linux, which of these is the lesser evil? > > Thanks, > Warren > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > >
> >Who said you needed to use jdk 1.1 ? > No one. That was the only option at the Sun Website. After 1.1 they call it J2SE. I am thickheaded tonight. Is JDK and J2SE the same driver? I found the JDBC download site (thanks? - we can forget Sun!) but now have another question. Is this driver included in the PostgreSQL-7.2.2.tar.gz that I downloaded last night? If I compile --with-java Practical PostgreSQL pg. 20 says I need ant and the JDK packages (but not the driver?) Thanks, Warren >From: Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net> >You can use any one of them, including jdk 1.4 > >Dave >On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 21:57, Warren Massengill wrote: > > Practical PostgreSQL pg. 12 > > The JDK is required by PostgreSQL if you ... > > > > Sun wanted to switch me to J2SE 1.4 > > But if I insist on JDK 1.1 I must choose between the Windows and Solaris > > versions. > > > > Using Linux, which of these is the lesser evil? > > > > Thanks, > > Warren _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
Warren, Yes, to build the driver from source you need ant, the driver source is in the tarball, you need the jdk for the libraries, and the compiler however: the easiest way is to just d/l the jar. Do yourself a favour and use the dev jar, personally weighing the (in)stability vs. the bugs I know exist in the stable jar. I would pick the dev jar. It's pretty solid. Dave On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 22:43, Warren Massengill wrote: > > > >Who said you needed to use jdk 1.1 ? > > > No one. That was the only option at the Sun Website. After 1.1 they call it > J2SE. > > I am thickheaded tonight. > > Is JDK and J2SE the same driver? > > I found the JDBC download site (thanks? - we can forget Sun!) but now have > another question. > Is this driver included in the PostgreSQL-7.2.2.tar.gz that I downloaded > last night? > > If I compile --with-java Practical PostgreSQL pg. 20 says I need ant and the > JDK packages (but not the driver?) > > Thanks, > Warren > > > >From: Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net> > > >You can use any one of them, including jdk 1.4 > > > >Dave > >On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 21:57, Warren Massengill wrote: > > > Practical PostgreSQL pg. 12 > > > The JDK is required by PostgreSQL if you ... > > > > > > Sun wanted to switch me to J2SE 1.4 > > > But if I insist on JDK 1.1 I must choose between the Windows and Solaris > > > versions. > > > > > > Using Linux, which of these is the lesser evil? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Warren > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) > >
Will do. Thanks again, Warren > >Warren, > >Yes, to build the driver from source you need ant, the driver source is >in the tarball, you need the jdk for the libraries, and the compiler > >however: the easiest way is to just d/l the jar. Do yourself a favour >and use the dev jar, personally weighing the (in)stability vs. the bugs >I know exist in the stable jar. I would pick the dev jar. It's pretty >solid. > >Dave _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
Warren, By way of clarification: JDK and J2SE aren't drivers, they're "development kits" (JDK = Java Development Kit; J2SE SDK = Jave 2 Platform, Standard Edition Software Development Kit). If I have my history straight, JDK was the terminology for the kit pre-1.2 and then it changed to SDK. JDBC is the driver, and it sounds like you're squared away with that now. :) Regards, Jim Dave Cramer wrote: > Warren, > > Yes, to build the driver from source you need ant, the driver source is > in the tarball, you need the jdk for the libraries, and the compiler > > however: the easiest way is to just d/l the jar. Do yourself a favour > and use the dev jar, personally weighing the (in)stability vs. the bugs > I know exist in the stable jar. I would pick the dev jar. It's pretty > solid. > > Dave > On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 22:43, Warren Massengill wrote: > >>>Who said you needed to use jdk 1.1 ? >>> >> >>No one. That was the only option at the Sun Website. After 1.1 they call it >>J2SE. >> >>I am thickheaded tonight. >> >>Is JDK and J2SE the same driver? >> >>I found the JDBC download site (thanks? - we can forget Sun!) but now have >>another question. >>Is this driver included in the PostgreSQL-7.2.2.tar.gz that I downloaded >>last night? >> >>If I compile --with-java Practical PostgreSQL pg. 20 says I need ant and the >>JDK packages (but not the driver?) >> >>Thanks, >>Warren >> >> >> >>>From: Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net> >> >>>You can use any one of them, including jdk 1.4 >>> >>>Dave >>>On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 21:57, Warren Massengill wrote: >>> >>>>Practical PostgreSQL pg. 12 >>>>The JDK is required by PostgreSQL if you ... >>>> >>>>Sun wanted to switch me to J2SE 1.4 >>>>But if I insist on JDK 1.1 I must choose between the Windows and Solaris >>>>versions. >>>> >>>>Using Linux, which of these is the lesser evil? >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>>Warren >>> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com >> >> >>---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command >> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) >> >> > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > >
O.K., Thanks. Believe I'm am runing now but I will know to get the newer kit next time. Warren >From: Jim Caley <caley@chesco.com> >CC: Warren Massengill <warrenmassengill@hotmail.com>, >"pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org" <pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org> >Subject: Re: [JDBC] JDK development kit >Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:45:30 -0400 > >Warren, > >By way of clarification: > >JDK and J2SE aren't drivers, they're "development kits" (JDK = Java >Development Kit; J2SE SDK = Jave 2 Platform, Standard Edition Software >Development Kit). If I have my history straight, JDK was the terminology >for the kit pre-1.2 and then it changed to SDK. > >JDBC is the driver, and it sounds like you're squared away with that now. >:) > >Regards, >Jim _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com