Обсуждение: Re: RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]
I like that idea. Best of both worlds. I will redo my patch to do that and resubmit. thanks, --Barry Dave Cramer wrote: > Bruce, Barry, > > How about checking for the existence of the date object in the > constructor? This would mean that it would only be created once per > thread. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian > Sent: June 25, 2001 2:50 PM > To: Barry Lind > Cc: Dave@micro-automation.net; 'PostgreSQL jdbc list' > Subject: Re: [JDBC] RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] > > >>Bruce, >> >>I don't think you need to back out Dave's patch. It works fine as it >>is. I just think it can be improved upon. >> > > OK, you just let me know. > >
Thanks. > > I like that idea. Best of both worlds. I will redo my patch to do that > and resubmit. > > thanks, > --Barry > > > Dave Cramer wrote: > > > Bruce, Barry, > > > > How about checking for the existence of the date object in the > > constructor? This would mean that it would only be created once per > > thread. > > > > Dave > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org > > [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian > > Sent: June 25, 2001 2:50 PM > > To: Barry Lind > > Cc: Dave@micro-automation.net; 'PostgreSQL jdbc list' > > Subject: Re: [JDBC] RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] > > > > > >>Bruce, > >> > >>I don't think you need to back out Dave's patch. It works fine as it > >>is. I just think it can be improved upon. > >> > > > > OK, you just let me know. > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026