Обсуждение: normalization problem
| Type | Party | Act | Judge_name | Judgement_date | Citation | |||||
Direct tax | A | IT Act | PK | 1 | 4 | ||||||
Direct tax | B | WT Act | PK | 2 | 5 | ||||||
Direct tax | A | WT Act | SK | 1 | 4 | ||||||
Direct tax | D | IT Act | KIP | 3 | 6 | ||||||
Company law | C | MRTP Act | PK | 1 | 7 | ||||||
Company law | C | Labour Act | YK | 1 | 7 | ||||||
Company law | F | Labour law | KIP | 3 | 8 | ||||||
Citation | Publication | Year | Volume
| Page
| |
4 | AIR | 1999 | 1 | 34 | |
4 | CTR | 1999 | 2 | 65 | |
5 | AIR | 1999 | 1 | 65 | |
5 | CTR | 1999 | 3 | 30 | |
6 | AIR | 2000 | 2 | 100 | |
6 | CTR | 2000 | 5 | 34 | |
| AIR | 1999 | 4 | 70 |
Judgement_date | Year | Month | Date |
1 | 1999 | Jan | 26 |
2 | 1999 | March | 30 |
3 | 2000 | July | 26 |
Act | Section | Rule |
IT Act | 1 | R1 |
IT Act | 2 | R2 |
WT Act | 1 | R3 |
As you can see, these tables are related to each other on the basis of some common
field and the attributes have in most cases either one to many or many to many relation.
Kindly, help me sovle this problem.
Hoping to receive your reply at the earliest,
thanking you,
pooja
What problem are you trying to solve?
Michael Davis
Database Architect and Senior Software Engineer, Seva Inc.
Email: mdavis@sevainc.com
-----Original Message-----
From: pooja agarwal [SMTP:jussna@sancharnet.in]
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 12:06 AM
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: normalization problem
<< File: ATT00070.htm >> Hello ,
I am doing Masters in Computer Application from Allahabad ( India ).
Your article on normalization is very informative.However, I have a
problem relating to this topic, whose table I am unable to
correctly make.
I am mailing you the problem.I hope you don't mind.
This database is used for searching of party or rules on the basis of either judge's name,judgement date,act as
reference
or citation. Type Party Act Judge_name Judgement_date Citation Direct tax A IT
Act PK 1 4 Direct tax B WT Act PK 2 5 Direct tax A WT Act SK 1
4 Direct tax D IT Act KIP 3 6 Company law C MRTP Act PK 1 7
Company law C Labour Act YK 1 7 Company law F Labour law KIP 3 8
Citation Publication Year Volume
Page
4 AIR 1999 1 34 4 CTR 1999 2 65 5 AIR 1999 1
65 5 CTR 1999 3 30 6 AIR 2000 2 100 6 CTR 2000 5 34
7
AIR 1999 4 70
Judgement_date Year Month Date 1 1999 Jan 26 2 1999 March 30
3 2000 July 26
Act Section Rule IT Act 1 R1 IT Act 2 R2 WT Act 1 R3
As you can see, these tables are related to each other on the basis of some common
field and the attributes have in most cases either one to many or many to many relation.
Kindly, help me sovle this problem.
Hoping to receive your reply at the earliest,
thanking you,
pooja