Обсуждение: re: Postodbc not working

Hi,

I too have dl'd the postodbc 0.35 from postodbc.magenet.com and it
doesn't work for me with Postgresql 6.3 _but_ it works with 6.2.x. So I
think this 0.35 was compiled for the old 6.2.x.

As I read in an older email, the internal communication has changed, and
an odbcdriver that is intended to work with 6.3 shouldn't work with
6.2.x, or am I totally wrong?

As I'm not in posession of either WatcomC++ nor MSVC, I can't compile
the
driver myself out of the sources combined with Postgresql 6.3. Could
anybody be so kind and give it a try?

rgds, Gottfried

--
Legal Warning: Do NOT send unsolicited commercial email to me -
consider this an official notice.

"By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer
 meets the definition of a telephone fax machine.  By Sec.227(b)(1)(C),
 it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment.
 By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is
 punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500,
whichever
 is greater, for each violation."

On Thu, 26 Mar 1998, Gottfried HARASEK wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I too have dl'd the postodbc 0.35 from postodbc.magenet.com and it
> doesn't work for me with Postgresql 6.3 _but_ it works with 6.2.x. So I
> think this 0.35 was compiled for the old 6.2.x.
>
> As I read in an older email, the internal communication has changed, and
> an odbcdriver that is intended to work with 6.3 shouldn't work with
> 6.2.x, or am I totally wrong?

    No, you are correct...there are some pretty major changes in
there...

On Thu, 26 Mar 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Mar 1998, Gottfried HARASEK wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I too have dl'd the postodbc 0.35 from postodbc.magenet.com and it
> > doesn't work for me with Postgresql 6.3 _but_ it works with 6.2.x. So I
> > think this 0.35 was compiled for the old 6.2.x.
> >
> > As I read in an older email, the internal communication has changed, and
> > an odbcdriver that is intended to work with 6.3 shouldn't work with
> > 6.2.x, or am I totally wrong?
>
>     No, you are correct...there are some pretty major changes in
> there...

Watch the contents of the include files.  When I was working on the OS/2
client port (libpq and psql) I found that a couple of include files had
older dates than their counterparts in 6.2.1.  One item that stands out
is PQsetdb changed from an extern to a #define.

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH   email: vev@michvhf.com   flame-mail: /dev/null
       # include <std/disclaimers.h>                   TEAM-OS2
   Online Searchable Campground Listings    http://www.camping-usa.com
              "I'm just not a fan of promoting stupidity!
            We have elected officials for that job!" -- Rock
==========================================================================