Обсуждение: system catalogs page
I was just noticing that, on this page here: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/catalogs.html ...all of the catalogs are in alphabetical order, except for pg_db_role_setting, which is filed in the place in alphabetical order where it would belong if the name were spelled pg_setting. Is there any reason I shouldn't go fix this? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
On 17 September 2010 18:17, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > I was just noticing that, on this page here: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/catalogs.html > > ...all of the catalogs are in alphabetical order, except for > pg_db_role_setting, which is filed in the place in alphabetical order > where it would belong if the name were spelled pg_setting. or pg_role_setting > Is there any reason I shouldn't go fix this? Looks wrong to me, so I'd say should be fixed. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I was just noticing that, on this page here: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/catalogs.html > ...all of the catalogs are in alphabetical order, except for > pg_db_role_setting, which is filed in the place in alphabetical order > where it would belong if the name were spelled pg_setting. > Is there any reason I shouldn't go fix this? Sounds like a mistake to me ... regards, tom lane