Обсуждение: FETCH FIRST
SQL200n specifies a new command similar to our LIMIT
FETCH { FIRST | NEXT } n { ROW | ROWS } ONLY
and also that the OFFSET command can have an optional suffix
{ ROW | ROWS }
Seems like a % project for the TODO list
-- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
Simon Riggs wrote:
> SQL200n specifies a new command similar to our LIMIT
>
> FETCH { FIRST | NEXT } n { ROW | ROWS } ONLY
>
> and also that the OFFSET command can have an optional suffix
>
> { ROW | ROWS }
>
> Seems like a % project for the TODO list
Where does this FETCH appear in a SELECT?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:45 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > SQL200n specifies a new command similar to our LIMIT
> >
> > FETCH { FIRST | NEXT } n { ROW | ROWS } ONLY
> >
> > and also that the OFFSET command can have an optional suffix
> >
> > { ROW | ROWS }
> >
> > Seems like a % project for the TODO list
>
> Where does this FETCH appear in a SELECT?
It's supposed to go *after* the OFFSET clause in a query, but making it
a simple synonym for LIMIT seems most sensible.
It's also allowed as part of the WITH clause (that we don't yet have).
-- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:45 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Where does this FETCH appear in a SELECT?
> It's supposed to go *after* the OFFSET clause in a query, but making it
> a simple synonym for LIMIT seems most sensible.
Huh? OFFSET isn't in standard SQL either. Are you sure you're not
confusing FETCH-from-a-cursor with SELECT?
regards, tom lane
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 11:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:45 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> Where does this FETCH appear in a SELECT? > > > It's supposed to go *after* the OFFSET clause in a query, but making it > > a simple synonym for LIMIT seems most sensible. > > Huh? OFFSET isn't in standard SQL either. Tis now. > Are you sure you're not > confusing FETCH-from-a-cursor with SELECT? Quite sure. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk