Обсуждение: libpq++ and libpqxx removed
they are no longer on the central repository, but are on GBorg ... I've made the appropriate chagnes to configure and Makefiles to reflect the fact that libpq++ is no longer part of the central distribution, *but* I used 'cvs remove' to remove the files themselves, so that the old branches (ie. if we do a v7.2.2, we need it) still have access to the code ... let me know if there are any problems ...
Can we perhaps have very prominent linking to gborg from the postgresql.org home page? Especially now that there's libpq++ and stuff on there? Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier > Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2002 8:21 AM > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed > > > > they are no longer on the central repository, but are on GBorg ... I've > made the appropriate chagnes to configure and Makefiles to reflect the > fact that libpq++ is no longer part of the central distribution, *but* I > used 'cvs remove' to remove the files themselves, so that the old branches > (ie. if we do a v7.2.2, we need it) still have access to the code ... > > let me know if there are any problems ... > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html >
There will be on the new portal, but you are right, we should have such on the current one until the new portal is in place ... Vince, can you add a link to it off the menus themselves on the left side? On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Can we perhaps have very prominent linking to gborg from the postgresql.org > home page? Especially now that there's libpq++ and stuff on there? > > Chris > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier > > Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2002 8:21 AM > > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org > > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > > Subject: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed > > > > > > > > they are no longer on the central repository, but are on GBorg ... I've > > made the appropriate chagnes to configure and Makefiles to reflect the > > fact that libpq++ is no longer part of the central distribution, *but* I > > used 'cvs remove' to remove the files themselves, so that the old branches > > (ie. if we do a v7.2.2, we need it) still have access to the code ... > > > > let me know if there are any problems ... > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > > > >
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > There will be on the new portal, but you are right, we should have such on > the current one until the new portal is in place ... > > Vince, can you add a link to it off the menus themselves on the left side? Sure. Make me a button that matches the rest. That's what the holdup has been for any changes. That's why I've been soliciting new designs. The new portal isn't going to help in this regard either, I've been trying to tell you that for months. > > On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > Can we perhaps have very prominent linking to gborg from the postgresql.org > > home page? Especially now that there's libpq++ and stuff on there? > > > > Chris > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > > > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier > > > Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2002 8:21 AM > > > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org > > > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > > > Subject: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed > > > > > > > > > > > > they are no longer on the central repository, but are on GBorg ... I've > > > made the appropriate chagnes to configure and Makefiles to reflect the > > > fact that libpq++ is no longer part of the central distribution, *but* I > > > used 'cvs remove' to remove the files themselves, so that the old branches > > > (ie. if we do a v7.2.2, we need it) still have access to the code ... > > > > > > let me know if there are any problems ... > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > > > > > > > > > Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo atPop4 Networking http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.com http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com ==========================================================================
Where can we see the new portal? Maybe it should be designed in such a way as to not use image links at all. From all my experience in doing websites - that'd be a _really_ good idea. Chris > > There will be on the new portal, but you are right, we should > have such on > > the current one until the new portal is in place ... > > > > Vince, can you add a link to it off the menus themselves on the > left side? > > Sure. Make me a button that matches the rest. That's what the holdup > has been for any changes. That's why I've been soliciting new designs. > The new portal isn't going to help in this regard either, I've been > trying to tell you that for months.
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Where can we see the new portal? Maybe it should be designed in such a way > as to not use image links at all. From all my experience in doing > websites - that'd be a _really_ good idea. I don't believe we are using image links on the new portal ... > > Chris > > > > There will be on the new portal, but you are right, we should > > have such on > > > the current one until the new portal is in place ... > > > > > > Vince, can you add a link to it off the menus themselves on the > > left side? > > > > Sure. Make me a button that matches the rest. That's what the holdup > > has been for any changes. That's why I've been soliciting new designs. > > The new portal isn't going to help in this regard either, I've been > > trying to tell you that for months. > >
> -----Original Message----- > From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:vev@michvhf.com] > Sent: 22 August 2002 03:25 > To: Marc G. Fournier > Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne; pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org; > pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed > > The new portal isn't going to help in this regard either, I've been trying to tell you that for months. Care to let me in on that one seeing as I'm the one who's been putting blood and sweat into it? Regards, Dave.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:chriskl@familyhealth.com.au] > Sent: 22 August 2002 03:28 > To: Vince Vielhaber; Marc G. Fournier > Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed > > > Where can we see the new portal? Maybe it should be designed > in such a way as to not use image links at all. From all my > experience in doing websites - that'd be a _really_ good idea. It doesn't use images for links. All the main links & menu items are held in a global php file so if a single change is made, it affects all pages. Regards, Dave.