Обсуждение: Posted 7.1 RPMs for Mandrake 7.2
I've posted RPMs for Mandrake, but could not put them in the obvious
place on the FTP site because the permissions do not allow group write
access. Lamar, could you open up that part of the tree to allow group
write permissions? In the meantime, I've placed the files in
/pub/binary/v7.1-Mandrake/.
I've built RPMs for 7.1.1, but perhaps we should wait until 7.1.2 to
post them given the pgtcl problem? Lamar, what are you planning for
7.1.1?
- Thomas
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> I've built RPMs for 7.1.1, but perhaps we should wait until 7.1.2 to
> post them given the pgtcl problem? Lamar, what are you planning for
> 7.1.1?
Given my plpgsql screwup, and the dump-7.0-views thing that Philip wants
to fix in pg_dump, I'd say there certainly will be a 7.1.2 pretty soon.
But I think we should wait a couple more days and see if any other bug
reports turn up. Maybe we should plan for the end of the week?
regards, tom lane
> HOWEVER, I _do_ have 7.1.1 RPMs built (minus some minor modifications) for
> RedHat 7.1. Thomas, would you mind e-mailing me any changes you made to
> anything (other than the version diff)? I have another patch from Trond to
> apply to the initscript, and more testing would be nice.
No changes were necessary :))
> Thomas, which pgtcl problem are you referring to?
The plpgsql one, of course. Got the name wrong...
> As to the group write permissions, Thomas...... The perms on the RPMS subdir
> now set g+w. Sorry. I'll need to set my umask a little more appropriately.
Great. I'll move things around. btw, I've found that things like "scp"
don't respect a .cshrc umask setting, so you will likely need to check
permissions when you are working in those directories anyway.
- Thomas
On Tuesday 08 May 2001 10:16, Tom Lane wrote: > Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > > I've built RPMs for 7.1.1, but perhaps we should wait until 7.1.2 to > > post them given the pgtcl problem? Lamar, what are you planning for > > 7.1.1? > Given my plpgsql screwup, and the dump-7.0-views thing that Philip wants > to fix in pg_dump, I'd say there certainly will be a 7.1.2 pretty soon. > But I think we should wait a couple more days and see if any other bug > reports turn up. Maybe we should plan for the end of the week? Given a quick 7.1.2, I would rather go through the release pain once. Is it just me, or do we have terrible luck with .1 subreleases? IIRC, 6.2.1 was the last good x.y.1 release. I'm not going to beat a dead horse, here, though. :-) HOWEVER, I _do_ have 7.1.1 RPMs built (minus some minor modifications) for RedHat 7.1. Thomas, would you mind e-mailing me any changes you made to anything (other than the version diff)? I have another patch from Trond to apply to the initscript, and more testing would be nice. If 7.1.2 is over a week away, I'll go ahead and release 7.1.1 RPMs -- but I would really like to incorporate any patch to the plpgsql code, Tom, being that I am a member of the OpenACS team :-O. I can easily patch and release 7.1.1 RPMs that don't have the bug -- not that that is the best idea, by any means, but it is for me just about a showstopper. Or I need to release a 7.1-2 set that includes RPM-specific bugfixes to the initscript and files list. Thomas, which pgtcl problem are you referring to? FWIW, my extant CHANGELOG entry for the 7.1.1 RPMs currently reads: * Mon May 07 2001 Lamar Owen <lamar@postgresql.org> <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> - 7.1.1 - 7.1.1-1 RPM release - Changes to initscript courtesy Karl DeBisschop - pg_restore was not in 7.1-1 - pl's back into /usr/lib/pgsql - use groupadd's -o and -r switches. As to the group write permissions, Thomas...... The perms on the RPMS subdir now set g+w. Sorry. I'll need to set my umask a little more appropriately. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
On Tuesday 08 May 2001 11:14, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > As to the group write permissions, Thomas...... The perms on the RPMS > > subdir now set g+w. Sorry. I'll need to set my umask a little more > > appropriately. > Great. I'll move things around. btw, I've found that things like "scp" > don't respect a .cshrc umask setting, so you will likely need to check > permissions when you are working in those directories anyway. Ah. Of course, Idon't use the csh :-). But I _do_ use scp exclusively to copy stuff. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11