> However, 7.1beta6 to 7.1rc4 to 7.1.0 would be an ok > progression, as 7.1 < 7.1.0, I think (saying that without having tested it could be > dangerous.... :-)). I like this 7.1.0, it would also help to clarify what exact version is at hand. People tend to use shorthands like 7.1 to refer to any patch version (like 7.1.3). Andreas
Zeugswetter Andreas SB writes: > > However, 7.1beta6 to 7.1rc4 to 7.1.0 would be an ok > > progression, as 7.1 < 7.1.0, I think (saying that without having tested it could be > > dangerous.... :-)). > > I like this 7.1.0, it would also help to clarify what exact version is at hand. > People tend to use shorthands like 7.1 to refer to any patch version (like 7.1.3). I like that. In fact, we almost shipped a 7.0.0 but it was switched back at the last minute because that's how it always was. Perhaps the objection is that a 7.1.0 would indicate that there will be a 7.1.1 bug fix release, but let's not kid ourselves. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
Сайт использует файлы cookie для корректной работы и повышения удобства. Нажимая кнопку «Принять» или продолжая пользоваться сайтом, вы соглашаетесь на их использование в соответствии с Политикой в отношении обработки cookie ООО «ППГ», в том числе на передачу данных из файлов cookie сторонним статистическим и рекламным службам. Вы можете управлять настройками cookie через параметры вашего браузера