Обсуждение: pg version date file

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

pg version date file

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Where is that file that makes an initdb required?  We are supposed to
change that file when an initdb is needed.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Where is that file that makes an initdb required?  We are supposed to
> change that file when an initdb is needed.

src/include/catalog/catversion.h.

I put it there on the theory that include/catalog/*.h changes would
be the most common reason for wanting to bump the serial number.
But maybe it belongs somewhere else...
        regards, tom lane


Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Where is that file that makes an initdb required?  We are supposed to
> > change that file when an initdb is needed.
> 
> src/include/catalog/catversion.h.
> 
> I put it there on the theory that include/catalog/*.h changes would
> be the most common reason for wanting to bump the serial number.
> But maybe it belongs somewhere else...

I just couldn't find it.  I looked in include only because version.h.in
was there.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> src/include/catalog/catversion.h.
>> 
>> I put it there on the theory that include/catalog/*.h changes would
>> be the most common reason for wanting to bump the serial number.
>> But maybe it belongs somewhere else...

> I just couldn't find it.  I looked in include only because version.h.in
> was there.

You could certainly make a case for moving it to src/include.  If
you want to do that, I won't object.
        regards, tom lane


Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> src/include/catalog/catversion.h.
> >> 
> >> I put it there on the theory that include/catalog/*.h changes would
> >> be the most common reason for wanting to bump the serial number.
> >> But maybe it belongs somewhere else...
> 
> > I just couldn't find it.  I looked in include only because version.h.in
> > was there.
> 
> You could certainly make a case for moving it to src/include.  If
> you want to do that, I won't object.

No, seems fine there.


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026