Обсуждение: pgsql: Suppress some "variable might be clobbered by longjmp" warnings.
Suppress some "variable might be clobbered by longjmp" warnings. Seen with an older gcc version. I'm not sure these represent any real risk factor, but still a bit scary. Anyway we have lots of other volatile-marked variables in this code, so a couple more won't hurt. Branch ------ master Details ------- http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4172bd88300524efd1728c247fbc1eff3c1ca6ed Modified Files -------------- src/pl/plperl/Util.xs | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------ src/pl/plpython/plpython.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
Tom Lane wrote:
> Suppress some "variable might be clobbered by longjmp" warnings.
>
> Seen with an older gcc version. I'm not sure these represent any real
> risk factor, but still a bit scary. Anyway we have lots of other
> volatile-marked variables in this code, so a couple more won't hurt.
I assume you saw my comment in basebackup.c:
* Some old compilers, e.g. gcc 2.95.3/x86, think that passing
* a struct in the same function as a longjump might clobber
* a variable. bjm 2011-02-04
* http://lists.apple.com/archives/xcode-users/2003/Dec//msg00051.html
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Suppress some "variable might be clobbered by longjmp" warnings. >> >> Seen with an older gcc version. I'm not sure these represent any real >> risk factor, but still a bit scary. Anyway we have lots of other >> volatile-marked variables in this code, so a couple more won't hurt. > I assume you saw my comment in basebackup.c: > * Some old compilers, e.g. gcc 2.95.3/x86, think that passing > * a struct in the same function as a longjump might clobber > * a variable. bjm 2011-02-04 > * http://lists.apple.com/archives/xcode-users/2003/Dec//msg00051.html Curious that you're getting different warnings with that than I get with HPPA 2.95.3. regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Suppress some "variable might be clobbered by longjmp" warnings. > >> > >> Seen with an older gcc version. I'm not sure these represent any real > >> risk factor, but still a bit scary. Anyway we have lots of other > >> volatile-marked variables in this code, so a couple more won't hurt. > > > I assume you saw my comment in basebackup.c: > > > * Some old compilers, e.g. gcc 2.95.3/x86, think that passing > > * a struct in the same function as a longjump might clobber > > * a variable. bjm 2011-02-04 > > * http://lists.apple.com/archives/xcode-users/2003/Dec//msg00051.html > > Curious that you're getting different warnings with that than I get > with HPPA 2.95.3. Yes. I just found the description at the URL interesting, stating the gcc just gets confused. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +