Обсуждение: Firebird adds Oracle-compatibility version

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Firebird adds Oracle-compatibility version

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Slashdot is running a story about a Firebird fork that adds Oracle
compatibility to allow Compiere to run unmodified:

    http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/26/1845230&tid=221

This reply really sums it up:

    http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=123253&cid=10356539

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I've been watching the devel list as those creating fyracle have been
asking about how to go about implementing this compatibility ... don't
expect these features to be merged into the main tree. Oracle's made
some pretty silly design decisions along the way, and other database
teams/vendors take exception at the suggestion they should reproduce the
quirks found in other products.
...
Oracle's a bit of a whore as far as implementing just about anything
they think will get software sold -- even if it's an absolutely abysmal
idea.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Re: Firebird adds Oracle-compatibility version

От
"Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Slashdot is running a story about a Firebird fork that adds Oracle
> compatibility to allow Compiere to run unmodified:
>
>     http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/26/1845230&tid=221
>
> This reply really sums it up:
>
>     http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=123253&cid=10356539
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I've been watching the devel list as those creating fyracle have been
> asking about how to go about implementing this compatibility ... don't
> expect these features to be merged into the main tree. Oracle's made
> some pretty silly design decisions along the way, and other database
> teams/vendors take exception at the suggestion they should reproduce the
> quirks found in other products.
> ...
> Oracle's a bit of a whore as far as implementing just about anything
> they think will get software sold -- even if it's an absolutely abysmal
> idea.

s/Oracle/MySQL/g? :)

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664