Обсуждение: Postgres 8.3.x upgrade
From the postgres web site, I can see the 8.3.5 is the latest version.
Question for people who have been on 8.3.5:
Is 8.3.5 very safe to use (no major new bugs)? Is it really better than the older versions of the 8.3.X families?
Thanks a lot,
Jessica
We are going to upgrade our Postgres servers (most 8.2.9 and some 8.2.4) to the 8.3.x version.
From the postgres web site, I can see the 8.3.5 is the latest version.
Question for people who have been on 8.3.5:
Is 8.3.5 very safe to use (no major new bugs)? Is it really better than the older versions of the 8.3.X families?
Thanks a lot,
Jessica
From: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Jessica Richard
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:51 AM
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: [ADMIN] Postgres 8.3.x upgrade
We are going to upgrade our Postgres servers (most 8.2.9 and some 8.2.4) to the 8.3.x version.
From the postgres web site, I can see the 8.3.5 is the latest version.
Question for people who have been on 8.3.5:
Is 8.3.5 very safe to use (no major new bugs)? Is it really better than the older versions of the 8.3.X families?
Thanks a lot,
Jessica
Yes, we've been using it for a few months, and it's fine. You *ALWAYS* want to be using the latest
version within the series. The PostgreSQL project releases those to fix bugs.
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> From: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Jessica Richard
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:51 AM
> To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
> Subject: [ADMIN] Postgres 8.3.x upgrade
>
FYI, we should point people here to explain upgrades:
http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> We are going to upgrade our Postgres servers (most 8.2.9 and some 8.2.4) to
> the 8.3.x version.
>
> >From the postgres web site, I can see the 8.3.5 is the latest version.
>
> Question for people who have been on 8.3.5:
>
> Is 8.3.5 very safe to use (no major new bugs)? Is it really better than the
> older versions of the 8.3.X families?
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Jessica
>
>
>
> Yes, we've been using it for a few months, and it's fine. You *ALWAYS* want
> to be using the latest
>
> version within the series. The PostgreSQL project releases those to fix
> bugs.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
>
> Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
>
> US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893
>
>
>
>
>
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Jessica Richard <rjessil@yahoo.com> wrote: > We are going to upgrade our Postgres servers (most 8.2.9 and some 8.2.4) to > the 8.3.x version. > > From the postgres web site, I can see the 8.3.5 is the latest version. > > Question for people who have been on 8.3.5: > > Is 8.3.5 very safe to use (no major new bugs)? Is it really better than the > older versions of the 8.3.X families? We've been running it in production since last fall and 8.3.x is a very stable and very fast branch. We had about ten or so queries that failed due to bad casting, that we fixed in about a day. Upgrading postgres, even counting these small issues, is one of the least painful upgrades I've ever done. As for 8.3.x with x being 0 through 5 right now, the newer versions are bug and security fixes only over 8.3.0. You want those bug fixes, and running an older update version (i.e. 8.3.1) versus the latest (i.e. 8.3.5) is rarely a good idea. Unlike some database products which are known to ship later versions that break things (**cough** MySQL **cough**) the postgresql hackers are VERY picky about what goes into a point update. **cough** (see http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=31001 )