Обсуждение: code.pgadmin.org
I've updated code.pgadmin.org so it links to the git repo instead of the no-longer-updated svn repo. I notice it's not being linked from the www.pgadmin.org site at all - I think that is because we wanted it to nbe a trial and then forgot about it.. Time to add it? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Le 30/12/2010 12:20, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > I've updated code.pgadmin.org so it links to the git repo instead of > the no-longer-updated svn repo. > > I notice it's not being linked from the www.pgadmin.org site at all - > I think that is because we wanted it to nbe a trial and then forgot > about it.. Time to add it? > We have a link in some "new release" news, but nowhere else (apart mailing lists archives). I'm not against adding this info, but it should be stated that the bugtracker won't track every fixed bug. -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 18:25, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > Le 30/12/2010 12:20, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >> I've updated code.pgadmin.org so it links to the git repo instead of >> the no-longer-updated svn repo. >> >> I notice it's not being linked from the www.pgadmin.org site at all - >> I think that is because we wanted it to nbe a trial and then forgot >> about it.. Time to add it? >> > > We have a link in some "new release" news, but nowhere else (apart > mailing lists archives). > > I'm not against adding this info, but it should be stated that the > bugtracker won't track every fixed bug. Of course. But it seems it's still a useful resources for people (if it isn't, we should discontinue it instead), so hiding it is a bad idea :-) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Le 30/12/2010 23:28, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 18:25, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >> Le 30/12/2010 12:20, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >>> I've updated code.pgadmin.org so it links to the git repo instead of >>> the no-longer-updated svn repo. >>> >>> I notice it's not being linked from the www.pgadmin.org site at all - >>> I think that is because we wanted it to nbe a trial and then forgot >>> about it.. Time to add it? >>> >> >> We have a link in some "new release" news, but nowhere else (apart >> mailing lists archives). >> >> I'm not against adding this info, but it should be stated that the >> bugtracker won't track every fixed bug. > > Of course. But it seems it's still a useful resources for people (if > it isn't, we should discontinue it instead), so hiding it is a bad > idea :-) > +1 -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > I've updated code.pgadmin.org so it links to the git repo instead of > the no-longer-updated svn repo. > > I notice it's not being linked from the www.pgadmin.org site at all - > I think that is because we wanted it to nbe a trial and then forgot > about it.. Time to add it? I thought we were going to move it to the new infrastructure before calling it "production"? -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:19, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> I've updated code.pgadmin.org so it links to the git repo instead of >> the no-longer-updated svn repo. >> >> I notice it's not being linked from the www.pgadmin.org site at all - >> I think that is because we wanted it to nbe a trial and then forgot >> about it.. Time to add it? > > I thought we were going to move it to the new infrastructure before > calling it "production"? Oh. Wasn't aware and/or forgot about that one :) But now that you mention it, I do recall having heard about it at some point... So I guess we should do that. It doesn't actually run anything other than the trac instance, does it? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Nope. On 12/31/10, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:19, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> >> wrote: >>> I've updated code.pgadmin.org so it links to the git repo instead of >>> the no-longer-updated svn repo. >>> >>> I notice it's not being linked from the www.pgadmin.org site at all - >>> I think that is because we wanted it to nbe a trial and then forgot >>> about it.. Time to add it? >> >> I thought we were going to move it to the new infrastructure before >> calling it "production"? > > Oh. Wasn't aware and/or forgot about that one :) But now that you > mention it, I do recall having heard about it at some point... > > So I guess we should do that. It doesn't actually run anything other > than the trac instance, does it? > > -- > Magnus Hagander > Me: http://www.hagander.net/ > Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ > -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Le 31/12/2010 10:54, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:19, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>> I've updated code.pgadmin.org so it links to the git repo instead of >>> the no-longer-updated svn repo. >>> >>> I notice it's not being linked from the www.pgadmin.org site at all - >>> I think that is because we wanted it to nbe a trial and then forgot >>> about it.. Time to add it? >> >> I thought we were going to move it to the new infrastructure before >> calling it "production"? > > Oh. Wasn't aware and/or forgot about that one :) But now that you > mention it, I do recall having heard about it at some point... > Wasn't aware there would be new infrastructure (apart from the postgresql one). Will we have one too? > So I guess we should do that. It doesn't actually run anything other > than the trac instance, does it? > -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 14:58, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > Le 31/12/2010 10:54, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:19, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>>> I've updated code.pgadmin.org so it links to the git repo instead of >>>> the no-longer-updated svn repo. >>>> >>>> I notice it's not being linked from the www.pgadmin.org site at all - >>>> I think that is because we wanted it to nbe a trial and then forgot >>>> about it.. Time to add it? >>> >>> I thought we were going to move it to the new infrastructure before >>> calling it "production"? >> >> Oh. Wasn't aware and/or forgot about that one :) But now that you >> mention it, I do recall having heard about it at some point... >> > > Wasn't aware there would be new infrastructure (apart from the > postgresql one). Will we have one too? We're making changes across the board for the postgresql.org infrastructure, yes. It just takes time. The pgadmin servers run off the postgresql.org infrastructure, so they will be affected as well. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/