Обсуждение: CVS Commit by dpage: Dave's great build system shuffle, part deux

Log Message:
-----------
Dave's great build system shuffle, part deux

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgadmin3:
        Makefile.am (r1.39 -> r1.40)
        configure.ac (r1.36 -> r1.37)
    pgadmin3/src:
        Makefile.am (r1.104 -> r1.105)

Added Files:
-----------
    pgadmin3/xtra:
        Makefile.am (r1.1)
    pgadmin3/xtra/pgagent:
        Makefile.am (r1.1)

cvs@developer.pgadmin.org wrote:

>Log Message:
>-----------
>Dave's great build system shuffle, part deux
>
>
>
In order to make things not too easy...
IMNSHO we should reorganize the main src tree too. I don't see a reason
why all the languages reside under a src directory. In addition, some wx
support files need a home, e.g. wx-pgadmin.dsw (lacking a readme) which
includes all wx packages to build, and proper setup.h (still missing)
for msw with all needed options.

Quite some traffic in cvs to come!

Regards,
Andreas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de]
> Sent: 26 April 2005 22:56
> To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org; Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] CVS Commit by dpage: Dave's
> great build system shuffle, part deux
>
> cvs@developer.pgadmin.org wrote:
>
> >Log Message:
> >-----------
> >Dave's great build system shuffle, part deux
> >
> >
> >
> In order to make things not too easy...
> IMNSHO we should reorganize the main src tree too. I don't
> see a reason
> why all the languages reside under a src directory. In
> addition, some wx
> support files need a home, e.g. wx-pgadmin.dsw (lacking a
> readme) which
> includes all wx packages to build, and proper setup.h (still missing)
> for msw with all needed options.

Yeah, agreed. The downside is that actually moving stuff will screw up
the history for each file as it will need to be removed and re-added. I
wasn't worried about that with pgagent and the admin module as their
history was outside the tree anyway, but I'm reluctant to start moving
established files.

Any objections to moving to subversion? I'm told that will solve this
problem...

> Quite some traffic in cvs to come!

Yup.

Regards, Dave.