Обсуждение: No WX_2_6_BRANCH?

Hi

Does anyone more familiar with wx development know
if there will be a WX_2_6_BRANCH? I'd like to use
the latest 2.6 version of wx for the nightly builds,
but it the moment there is only a WX_2_6_0 tag, which
I believe won't incorporate further changes to
2.6

Since there is a WX_2_2_BRANCH and a WX_2_4_BRANCH,
I guess that there would be a WX_2_6_BRANCH as soon
as 2.6 is released - but it hasn't appeared.


greetings, Florian Pflug

Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anyone more familiar with wx development know
> if there will be a WX_2_6_BRANCH?

There's been a lengthy discussion about when and how to branch, I got
tired after some 20 msgs.

I'd like to use
> the latest 2.6 version of wx for the nightly builds,

Hm, we usually use a very exact version for snapshots, in this case it
would be 2.6.0 release. For development it's ok to use cvs head, but not
for daily builds.

Regards,
Andreas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
> Andreas Pflug
> Sent: 26 April 2005 15:42
> To: Florian G. Pflug
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] No WX_2_6_BRANCH?
>
> Hm, we usually use a very exact version for snapshots, in
> this case it
> would be 2.6.0 release. For development it's ok to use cvs
> head, but not
> for daily builds.

Speaking on which, I'm finding that 2.6 will not compile on Slackware 9
or 10 with --enable-mimetype=no. Is this still required (I can't see any
mention of it in the 2.6 README).

Regards, Dave

Andreas Pflug wrote:
>> Does anyone more familiar with wx development know
>> if there will be a WX_2_6_BRANCH?
>
> There's been a lengthy discussion about when and how to branch, I got
> tired after some 20 msgs.
>
>> I'd like to use
>> the latest 2.6 version of wx for the nightly builds,
>
> Hm, we usually use a very exact version for snapshots, in this case it
> would be 2.6.0 release. For development it's ok to use cvs head, but not
> for daily builds.
Ok - I'll switch the nighty builds to use 2.6.0 then.

greetings, Florian Pflug

Dave Page wrote:

>
>Speaking on which, I'm finding that 2.6 will not compile on Slackware 9
>or 10 with --enable-mimetype=no. Is this still required (I can't see any
>mention of it in the 2.6 README).
>
>

Strictly speaking, it shouldn't matter at all. We don't use mime
directly, but xrc will do so indirectly. reading the mime config files
takes quite a while, and used to throw asserts. So the advice would be
to use --disable-mimetype if possible.

Regards,
Andreas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de]
> Sent: 26 April 2005 22:46
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] No WX_2_6_BRANCH?
>
>
> Strictly speaking, it shouldn't matter at all. We don't use mime
> directly, but xrc will do so indirectly. reading the mime
> config files
> takes quite a while, and used to throw asserts. So the advice
> would be
> to use --disable-mimetype if possible.

Nope, doesn't seem to be. I get the same errors on developer.pgadmin.org
(slack9.1) and on my workstation (slack10.0) :-(

Anyone tried on any other distros yet?

Regards, Dave

Dave Page wrote:

>
>Nope, doesn't seem to be. I get the same errors on developer.pgadmin.org
>(slack9.1) and on my workstation (slack10.0) :-(
>
>
>
This is worth a bug report to wx, maybe with some failure details.... :-)
The 2.6 release was pushed out in a hurry, maybe Julian caught some M$
virus (sw matures on client machines). A 2.6.1 release seems due quite soon.

Regards,
Andreas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de]
> Sent: 26 April 2005 22:59
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] No WX_2_6_BRANCH?
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> >
> >Nope, doesn't seem to be. I get the same errors on
> developer.pgadmin.org
> >(slack9.1) and on my workstation (slack10.0) :-(
> >
> >
> >
> This is worth a bug report to wx, maybe with some failure
> details.... :-)
> The 2.6 release was pushed out in a hurry, maybe Julian
> caught some M$
> virus (sw matures on client machines). A 2.6.1 release seems
> due quite soon.

Yeah, I'll recreate it tomorrow and report to wx-dev.

/D

Dave Page ha scritto:

>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de]
>>Sent: 26 April 2005 22:59
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: pgadmin-hackers
>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] No WX_2_6_BRANCH?
>>
>>Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Nope, doesn't seem to be. I get the same errors on
>>>
>>>
>>developer.pgadmin.org
>>
>>
>>>(slack9.1) and on my workstation (slack10.0) :-(
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>This is worth a bug report to wx, maybe with some failure
>>details.... :-)
>>The 2.6 release was pushed out in a hurry, maybe Julian
>>caught some M$
>>virus (sw matures on client machines). A 2.6.1 release seems
>>due quite soon.
>>
>>
>
>Yeah, I'll recreate it tomorrow and report to wx-dev.
>
>/D
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>      joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>
Hi, Under Gentoo 2005.0 wxGTK_2.6.0 refuse to build with
--enable-mimetype=no. So I compile it with --enable-mimetype=yes
and then rebuild pgadmin3 without problem.


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.3 - Release Date: 25/04/2005

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
> Massimo Fidanza
> Sent: 26 April 2005 23:13
> To: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] No WX_2_6_BRANCH?
>
> >
> Hi, Under Gentoo 2005.0 wxGTK_2.6.0 refuse to build with
> --enable-mimetype=no. So I compile it with --enable-mimetype=yes
> and then rebuild pgadmin3 without problem.

Thanks Massimo - I'll incllude that in my bug report.

Regards, Dave