Обсуждение: Re: Solaris port status
> -----Original Message----- > From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz@club-internet.fr] > Sent: 10 December 2003 19:31 > To: Andreas Pflug; Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Solaris port status > > Hi all, > > As I hoped in my previous mail, I finally got it running! > Congratulation for your code and a big thank to Adam's > "configure" scripts! It was quite straight to get it build > although I had to patch one file in > pgAdmin3 (see patch attached). Well done Raphaël - I'll buy you a large beer if we meet sometime! > 1) The patch attached just add a define concerning > INADDR_NONE which is not defined in solaris headers. I think > the patch places the 3 lines where they should be but please > correct it if it doesn't suite your taste :) I'll hopefully look at this tomorrow. > Is there any chance to get a Solaris box which could host the build ? > For the moment, the only thing I could get by broadcasting to > my friend is a "SS 5" which I doubt I can install sol 9 on > it. I'm waiting for another answer but if you know someone > who could provide better, it would be great. Hmm, I don't have any Sparcs, but I did get MS Virtual PC 2004 yesterday. Slackware and FreeBSD run on it a treat - I wasintending to try Solaris 8 x86 tomorrow (I don't have 9). It's not a box that could stay permanently of course, but Icould do the occasional snapshot using it. Anyone else have access to a Sparc? Regards, Dave
Dear Edward Romero, Romero, Edward J., CTR, OSD-PA&E wrote: >Mr. Enrici: > >Please reference the following link: >http://www.mail-archive.com/pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org/msg03176.html . > > I remember this one :) It was the first time I got it up & (a little) running ;) >I am having considerable trouble getting wx(Windows, Widgets, GTK) to >compile on my Solaris 9 system, so that I may then install pgAdmin III. I >have tried the latest stable release of wxGTK (2.4.2), > forget about 2.4.x releases, they are not ok for pgAdmin3 and do not permit a correct build of it. >as well as one of the >latest CVS snapshots (20040330) as well as the latest snapshot available >from the pgadmin download mirrors (20031010-7). > I never got the 20031010-7 to build on Solaris 9... So, forget about it too :( > The instructions on the >pgAdmin webpage state that there is a supported version available on the >download mirrors, except that version's timestamp is before the date of the >referenced archive URL, leading me to believe that it cannot be used for my >purposes, as well as the fact that it will not compile. My question, then, >is where can I find updated instructions and applications that I need to get >pgAdmin III fully installed on my Solaris 9 system? > > I didn't get much time to give to solaris port although I think it's an important thing to get it running well. Hiroshi Saito got something running more recently and I think he can help you and may be provide to you its Solaris 9 build. As far as I can remember, he had problems with locales but nothing which stop pgAdmin3 from running well in a C locale (am I telling the truth Hiroshi ?). Note that Solaris 9 is not actually a "supported" OS version for pgAdmin3... It's just an under development one :) At the moment, I prefer to concentrate my efforts on a good Debian build. I'll come back on Solaris port as soon as I have more time. Hiroshi, can you tell me more about your port status on Solaris ? Do you need help for packaging things (I mean provide a pkgadd compatible format) ? Regards, Raphaël P.S. Please CC to the list, you will get more chance to get a rapid and better answer ;)
Dear Edward Romero, From: "Raphaël Enrici" <blacknoz@club-internet.fr> > I didn't get much time to give to solaris port although I think it's an > important thing to get it running well. Hiroshi Saito got something > running more recently and I think he can help you and may be provide to > you its Solaris 9 build. As far as I can remember, he had problems with > locales but nothing which stop pgAdmin3 from running well in a C locale > (am I telling the truth Hiroshi ?). Yes, a Multi-Byte problem still exists. See this. http://cre-ent.skcapi.co.jp/~saito/pgadmin3/Solaris9_Sparc64/ However, it wasn't touching it after that time. I must seem to try it again under the present release condition. I don't have the time when it is busy it this week with me disappointed.:-( Sorry... Regards, Hiroshi Saito