Re: Clarification to pg_upgrade docs on reverting to old cluster
От | Daniel Gustafsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Clarification to pg_upgrade docs on reverting to old cluster |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ywhFn7QMoEFtC4Juck-QQ5i__Z6nxZGy5YwAirAmY0Bn55Mf0CEjAnnb3f2DHU5ARCAlFkry5w5FKEZgcnRebn8qAX3YDvOAURq-I_c4Ac8=@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Clarification to pg_upgrade docs on reverting to old cluster (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Clarification to pg_upgrade docs on reverting to old cluster
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Friday, April 5, 2019 2:26 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:14 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:Reading the pg_upgrade reference page, I get the feeling that one of thebullets under "Reverting to old cluster" is a bit thin on detail to be helpfulto newcomers:"If you ran pg_upgrade with --link, the data files are shared between theold and new cluster. If you started the new cluster, the new server haswritten to those shared files and it is unsafe to use the old cluster."This is perfectly correct, but it fails to provide information on what to donext in case reverting is in fact what the user wants. The attached patch addsa short sentence saying the old cluster should be restored from backups at thispoint.Let's have two non-english natives discuss it :),
What could possibly go wrong =)
but wouldn't it sound better with "in this case" than "at this point"? And as a really small nitpick, restore from backup, rather than backups?
Agreed.
The third bulletpoint also seems quite complicated really. If we're tweaking these, wouldn't it be better if we split that one in two -- one for "if you ran it without --link", that should reallyi be listed above any of the other options?
Looking at it closer I tend to agree, and updated the patch to split this up in
an attempt to make it a bit clearer for newcomers to pg_upgrade. How about the
attached version?
cheers ./daniel
Вложения
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: