Re: postgres dies while doing vacuum analyze
От | teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres dies while doing vacuum analyze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | xuywv6cmtim.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres dies while doing vacuum analyze (Manuel Sugawara <masm@fciencias.unam.mx>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres dies while doing vacuum analyze
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Manuel Sugawara <masm@fciencias.unam.mx> writes: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > > > Manuel Sugawara <masm@fciencias.unam.mx> writes: > > > [ vacuum analyze dies ] > > > It is running on Redhat Linux 7.1 i686 with 2.4.2-2 kernel. > > > Here is the back trace from gdb > > > > > (gdb) bt > > > #0 strcoll () at strcoll.c:229 > > > > We've heard reports before of strcoll() crashing on apparently valid > > input. It seems to be a Red Hat-specific problem; the three reports > > I have in my notes are from people running RH 7.0 (check the archives > > from 1/1/01, 1/24/01, 3/1/01 if you want to see the prior reports). > > > > It's possible that Postgres is doing something that confuses RH's > > locale library, but I dunno what. Since no other platform is reporting > > it, it could also be a plain old bug in that locale library. > > After a look into strcoll I found the bug. Attached is a tarball > including a patch for strcoll, glibc.spec and an small program that > shows the bug. Will do... what is the expected result of the testcase? It seems to work alright for me, but I'm running a slightly newer version than we have released yet... (glibc-2.2.3-11, look in rawhide). -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: