Re: [HACKERS] RPM changes for 7.1.
От | teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] RPM changes for 7.1. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | xuyvgse3emm.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RPM changes for 7.1. (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>) |
Список | pgsql-ports |
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > 1.) Addition of a postgresql-lib subpackage. Rationale: those using > just the Perl, Python, or Tcl clients may not want the full psql cli and > documetation installed just to use their client. This package would > simply be the shared object dynamic load libraries necessary for any > client. Sounds like a good idea. > 2.) Addition of a postgresql-pltcl subpackage. Rationale: pl/tcl is > currently included as part of the postgresql-tcl package. If someone > has the need for a tcl-client ONLY installation, they currently cannot > do so due to the postgresql-tcl package's dependency upon the server > subpackage being loaded. Likewise, answering the question 'why not put > pl/tcl in the main server package', someone needing the server package, > but not pl/tcl, bight not want to have the full Tcl client installed > just to run a server. The package is 64 k. Why split it? > I am a minimalist not because of a desire to save disk space -- disk is > cheap, after all. I am a minimalist because of security -- if I don't > _need_ Perl installed, then I shouldn't be forced to install Perl, for > instance. I've yet to see a security hole from documentation :) > -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: