Re: RPM building (was regression on RedHat)
От | teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RPM building (was regression on RedHat) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | xuyn1ae1vmr.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RPM building (was regression on RedHat) (Justin Clift <aa2@bigpond.net.au>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Justin Clift <aa2@bigpond.net.au> writes: > It's not "Mandrake" that will be broken. Mandrake is also often used by > new Linux users who wouldn't have the slightest idea about setting GCC > options. It'll be THEM that have broken installations if we take this > approach (as an aside, that means that WE will be probably also be > answering more questions about PostgreSQL being broken on Mandrake > systems). > > Isn't it better that PostgreSQL works with what it's got on a system AND > ALSO that someone notifies the Mandrake people regarding the problem? Most people will use what the vendor ship - a vendor (like us) look into the benefits (stability, performance, compatiblity) of different packages, and make a selection. If they've done a choice of which options are used in their distribution, they are obviously fine with the consequences. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: