Re: HELP! BUG? pg_dump mucks up grant/revoke
От | teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: HELP! BUG? pg_dump mucks up grant/revoke |
Дата | |
Msg-id | xuyelqqjyt7.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: HELP! BUG? pg_dump mucks up grant/revoke (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: HELP! BUG? pg_dump mucks up grant/revoke
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > > A pg_dump that can't be restored should be a release forcer, IMHO. > > Let's not panic here. The actual net effect of these bugs will be that > the pg_dump output script fails to restore the permissions and/or > comment associated with a view. Which'd be annoying, but hardly > something to ruin your whole day. The impact will vary from location to location... but given that this is the only way to upgrade the database (as you know, this is one of my pet peeves), it needs to work. > pg_dump issues, but the WAL truncation fix seems to be something that > lots of people need. Are those also in the 7.1-stable branch? -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: