Re: Why dump/restore to upgrade?
От | teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why dump/restore to upgrade? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | xuyadukdjr8.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why dump/restore to upgrade? (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > On Friday 08 February 2002 12:44 am, Tom Lane wrote: > > mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com> writes: > > > but I'd like to make a general call to arms that this (or 7.3) should be > > > the last release to require this. > > > We will never make such a commitment, at least not in the foreseeable > > future. > > Why? > > > But to bind > > ourselves forever to the current on-disk format is sheer folly. > > Certainly true. But upgradability!=bound-to-the-same-format. > > > And if you have to convert the datafile format then you might as > > well dump and reload. > > No. Dump - reload is folly. And it doesn't always work. And that's the > problem. Add some unicode into it for even more fun. Bah. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: