Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
От | teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | xuy66m62mt3.fsf@hoser.devel.redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > Now, J Random slides in the new OS CD on a backup of his main server, > and upgrades. RedHat 7.2's installer is very smart -- if no packages > are left that use glibc 2.0, it doesn't install the compat-libs > necessary for glibc 2.0 apps to run. Actually, glibc is a bad example of things to break - it has versioned symbols, so postgresql is pretty likely to continue working (barring doing extremely low-level stuff, like doing weird things to the loader or depend on buggy behaviour (like Oracle did)). Postgresql doesn't use C++ either (which is a horrible mess wrt. binary compatibility - there is no such thing, FTTB). However, if it depended on kernel specific behaviour (like things in /proc, which may or may not have changed its output format) it could break. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: