Re: Buglist
От | Vivek Khera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Buglist |
Дата | |
Msg-id | x7wud73b7g.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Buglist (Bo Lorentsen <bl@netgroup.dk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Buglist
|
Список | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: TL> Just nice'ing the VACUUM process is likely to be counterproductive TL> because of locking issues (priority inversion). Though if anyone cares TL> to try it on a heavily-loaded system, I'd be interested to hear the TL> results... tried it once. didn't make much difference except that vacuum took longer than normal. i didn't see any deadlocks. i actually figured out what my main problem was. vacuum every 6 hours on my two busiest tables was taking longer than 6 hours when we were very busy... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: