Re: How is this possible? (more on deadlocks)
От | Vivek Khera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How is this possible? (more on deadlocks) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | x7hdqobc4i.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Deadlocks -- what can I do about them? (Carlos Moreno <moreno@mochima.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "CM" == Carlos Moreno <moreno@mochima.com> writes: CM> Ok, now I'm really intrigued by what looks to me CM> (possibly from a naive point of view) like a bug, CM> or rather, a limitation on the implementation. [[ ... ]] CM> I don't know about the internals of how transactions CM> and locks and FK constraints are handled, but I'm CM> analyzing it and describing what seems to be CM> happening internally, based on the behaviour I CM> observe. FWIW I get bit by this quite a bit. Unfortunately all the deadlock avoidance theory doesn't help you since you're not explicitly getting the locks, and as you see, ordering the insert/update operations such as to avoid conflicting locks is hard to do. If I could designate the transaction I prefer to be killed, it would save me a lot: often my short easy to repeat transaction wins out over some large multi-thousand row select/insertion operation. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-301-869-4449 x806 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: