Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
От | Vivek Khera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | x7ad88q2yd.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) |
Список | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "sm" == scott marlowe <scott.marlowe> writes: >> will ungracefully kill the DB process(es). Doesn't matter what DB (or >> any other application) you're running, you *can* lose data this way. sm> While it is possible to lose a non-committed transaction, WAL prevents the sm> database from becoming corrupted. Assuming proper fsyncing of your hard sm> drives (i.e. SCSI, or IDE with write cache disabled) So you're saying it is not possible to corrupt the WAL if the process is ungracefully killed by the OS? -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: