Re: disk performance benchmarks
От | Vivek Khera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: disk performance benchmarks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | x73c1kvjxg.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | disk performance benchmarks ("Shane Wright" <shiversraa@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: disk performance benchmarks
|
Список | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "SW" == Shane Wright <Shane> writes: SW> But, we have now taken the plunge and I'm in a position to do some SW> benchmarking to actually get some data. Basically I was wondering if SW> anyone else had any particular recommendations (or requests) about the SW> most useful kinds of benchmarks to do. I did a bunch of benchmarking on a 14 disk SCSI RAID array comparing RAID 5, 10, and 50. My tests consisted of doing a full restore of a 30Gb database (including indexes) and comparing the times to do the restore, the time to make the indexes, and the time to vacuum. Then I ran a bunch of queries. It was damn near impossible to pick a 'better' RAID config, so I just went with RAID5. You can find many of my posts on this topic on the list archives from about august - october of last year. Basically, you have to approach it holistically to tune the system: Pg config parameters, memory, and disk speed are the major factors. That and your schema needs to be not idiotic. :-) -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-301-869-4449 x806 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: