Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Anyone got time to review an article? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | web-6703557@davinci.ethosmedia.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Anyone got time to review an article? (Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Tom, > > I've got one in the works for http://databasejournal.com/, and I was > > hoping someone could look it over for me to catch any egregious errors. I'm on vacation, so I don't have the ability to test the actual SQL. The article text is fine. You might want to, in future articles, suggest that people run EXPLAIN ANALYZE and not just EXPLAIN in order to see when the query planner is estimating wrong. BTW, the queries that GForge uses to generate the category counts for the trove map are egregiously bad and generate wrong counts to boot. They're basically a loop of queries, one *per category*, when the whole thing could be done in a single query. I've been meaning to fix this for some time, but I got hung up on getting GForge installed on my dev machine. Maybe later ... -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: