Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | web-1824321@davinci.ethosmedia.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine? ("Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Henrik Oops! Two corrections, below. Sorry about the typos. > First off, I'm moving this discussion to the PGSQL-PERFORMANCE list, > where it belongs. To subscribe, send the message "subscribe > pgsql-perform your@email.address" to "majordomo@postgresql.org". Sorry ... thats "subscribe pgsql-performance your@email.address". > Then, of course, it becomes an interactive process. You change the > settings, re-start the database server, and watch the memory used by > the postgreSQL processes. Your goal is to have that memory usage > hover around 700mb during heavy usage periods (any less, and you are That's "600mb", not "700mb". I also just read Tom's response regarding reserving more RAM for kernel buffering. This hasn't been my experience, but then I work mostly with transactional databases (many read-write requests) rather than read-only databases. As such, I'd be interested in a test: Calculate out your PostgreSQL RAM to total, say, 256mb and run a speed test on the database. Then calculate it out to the previous 600mb, and do the same. I'd like to know the results. In fact, e-mail me off list if you want further help -- I'm interested in the outcome. -Josh Berkus
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: