Re: Is is worth organising a
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is is worth organising a |
Дата | |
Msg-id | web-1808255@davinci.ethosmedia.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is is worth organising a (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Justin, Shridhar, > Cool. If you can get a good guide to OpenOffice.org + PostgreSQL > happening, then the OpenOffice.org guys will definitely want to add > it > to their site (and we can post links to that to reduce duplication). I'd swear that there already is one, somewhere. I'll look; if not, I need to write one as a member of both projects, hey? Regarding MS Access replacement: Both PGAccess (www.pgaccess.org) and OpenOffice.org are working on this from opposite ends, and I'd judge are 60-70% of the way there. In the new beta, OpenOffice.org will have a "Form Wizard" and a "Report Wizard" as well as the data browser and related capabilites. There is supposed to be a native (SDBC) Postgres driver in development. I don't know what the status of this is. For PGAccess, there is already some capability to design tcl/tk forms and reports from PGAccess, using an interface remarkably like FoxPro or Paradox9, if anyone here knows those apps. It's just buggy as all-get-out right now, and undocumented (the latter being partially my fault). And for those inclined to pay licensing fees, there's always Kylix, or MSAccess itself. I did experiment with the Kompany's Rekall, but that tool is really built for MySQL and has some problems with Postgres. Actually, I'd say that PGAccess has great possibilites as a real MS Access-killer, this year even, if some commercial company were to produce a polished, supported version. -Josh Berkus
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: