Re: Non-atomic structures instead of arrays
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Non-atomic structures instead of arrays |
Дата | |
Msg-id | web-151245@davinci.ethosmedia.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Non-atomic structures instead of arrays ("Michael D. Klatt" <mdklatt@ou.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Michael, > The documentation implies that you can have a non-atomic field other > than a > simple array, perhaps something like a C structure of different > types. Is > this possible, and if so, how? First off, you need to evaluate your reasons for wanting an non-atomic field. As you may know, non-atomic fields violate relational integrity and lead to development, maintainence, and normalization problems. Also, it is nearly impossible to index them effectively, resulting in poor performance. Frankly, I have yet to hear a case for a custom non-atomic field that was not better solved by seperating the data in to several fields of different datatypes. That being said, the way you create a non-atomic field is by creating a custom data type. This is no simple task. See: http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?sql-createtype.html Please note that you will have to write functions for input, display, and transmission of this custom data type, as well as manually defining any operators (+, ||, etc.) that you want to use with the custom data type. -Josh Berkus ______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________ Josh Berkus Complete information technology josh@agliodbs.com and data management solutions (415) 565-7293 for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533 and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: