Re: Why our Valgrind reports suck
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why our Valgrind reports suck |
Дата | |
Msg-id | vcbwaa7wtojfkhrhmb6d6aexhf7l3mpwzud2defzifnvejlhlc@wh4mkk5bqpgc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why our Valgrind reports suck (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why our Valgrind reports suck
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2025-05-22 21:48:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > >> But this is the last step to get to zero reported leaks in a run of the core > >> regression tests, so let's do it. > > > I assume that's just about the core tests, not more? I.e. I can't make skink > > enable leak checking? > > No, we're not there yet. I've identified some other backend issues (in > postgres_fdw in particular), and I've not looked at frontend programs > at all. For most frontend programs, I'm dubious how much we care. Skink only tests backend stuff anyway, but the other backend issues make it a no go for no... > I'm envisioning this patch series as v19 work, were you > thinking we should be more aggressive? Mostly agreed - but I am wondering if the AV fix should be backpatched? Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: