Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per |
Дата | |
Msg-id | v2y603c8f071004051248hc680299bz1c368ad89c9e6df5@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 15:02 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Simon Riggs escribió: >> > On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 17:08 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: >> > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Simon Riggs <sriggs@postgresql.org> wrote: >> > > > Log Message: >> > > > ----------- >> > > > Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per docs. >> > > >> > > On the recent discussion (*1), some people argued that specifying neither >> > > primary_conninfo nor restore_command in the standby mode is not unreasonable, >> > > and we reached the consensus that the setting should be allowed. So this >> > > commit doesn't reflect the discussion. How about reverting the commit, >> > > and restarting the discussion if you have complaint against the consensus? >> > >> > The attached patch changes the messages and downgrades FATAL to WARNING. >> > >> > Comments? >> >> Please note that errdetail must be a complete sentence. > > Better? I haven't tested this (bad words to start out with, I know) but assuming this message is going to print once on startup rather than repeatedly, +1 from me. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: