Re: prepared statement call fails
От | Thomas Hallgren |
---|---|
Тема | Re: prepared statement call fails |
Дата | |
Msg-id | thhal-0qzqPAq+JcC4JMVWy0uhu5aGt4SMIfJ@mailblocks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: prepared statement call fails (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: prepared statement call fails
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Oliver Jowett wrote: > If you have some particular concerns about how the proposed SP syntax, > whatever it is, is going to break the JDBC driver, by all means raise > them.. but this seems like vague handwaving at the moment. I agree that abandoning the current support is a very bad idea. We all have to live with it now. I was surprised to see that it was implemented this way though. My guess is that it's uncommon. It's certanly doable although you will need to dynamically support both mappings once the real SP's arrive and also thoroughly explain some subtle differences in how auto-commit works one way if the underlying code calls a function and another way if it calls a stored procedure. I for one will stick with PreparedStatement for function calls and reserve CallableStatement for future SP's when using the client driver. This is the approach that I also take on my JDBC driver in PL/Java. Any attempt to use CallableStatement there will yield an exception informing the user that stored procedures are not yet implemented. I do not do it that way because I'm lazy. I do it because I think it's cleaner and closer to the spec. No I'll take down my hand and be silent :-) Regards, Thomas Hallgren
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: