Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP
От | Thomas Hallgren |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | thhal-0q2QoBAcS8rQNMMgltyK0dCUas8l5TD@mailblocks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
With great help from Magnus, who advised me to use lspfix from cexx.org to list my lsp's, I found that I had gapsp.dll, "Neoteris DNS Provider" installed. An uninstall of the Neoteris software made this problem go away. Regards, Thomas Hallgren Thomas Hallgren wrote: > I added some traces to the code. I know that the following happens > when I start a postmaster. > > StartupDatabase will call internal_fork_exec, it calls > write_inheritable_socket 4 times and succeeds. > > During the first iteration of ServerLoop: > StartBackgroundWriter will call internal_fork_exec and succeed. > pgstat_forkexec will call internal_fork_exec and succeed. > > In the second iteration of ServerLoop, pgstat_forkexec will again > call will call internal_fork_exec. This time it fails. > According to the log it fails on line: > > write_inheritable_socket(¶m->pgStatSock, pgStatSock, childPid); > > i.e. on it's second call to write_inheriable_socket. The failure is in > a postgres.exe process, not postmaster.exe (and that's why I can't > debug propery on Windoz). > > Hope this helps. > > Regards, > Thomas Hallgren > > > Magnus Hagander wrote: > >>>> If it's two zombies per minute, then I bet it's the stat >>> collector and >>>> stat bufferer. They are restarted by the postmaster if not >>> found to >>>> be running. >>>> >>> That would make some sense, because the stat processes need to set >>> up new sockets (for the pipe between them). The autovacuum theory >>> didn't hold any water in my eyes because autovacuum doesn't create >>> any new sockets. >>> >>> However, why two zombies? That would mean that the grandchild >>> process started, which should mean that the pipe was already created >>> ... >>> >>> Does Windows have any equivalent of strace whereby we could watch >>> what's happening during stats process launch? >>> >> >> >> First of all, I won't be able to dig into this any more until next week >> - sorry about that. But others are always free to :-) >> >> There is no strace equivalent builtin, but you can get an addon from >> http://www.bindview.com/Services/RAZOR/Utilities/Windows/strace_readme.c >> fm. Don't put it on a production box permanently, though, it tends to >> cause BSODs in some cases. >> >> //Magnus >> >> > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: