Re: Status of server side Large Object support?
От | Thomas Hallgren |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Status of server side Large Object support? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | thhal-0VHGFAoUmcC4pgMoJF+KCg4PnkFjXIf@mailblocks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Status of server side Large Object support? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Status of server side Large Object support?
Re: Status of server side Large Object support? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Sonntag, 28. November 2004 12:33 schrieb Thomas Hallgren: > >>Hmm, ok. But there's no way to stream them in and out from disk. From >>what I can see, you have to bring all of it into memory. Not so ideal >>perhaps if you want to provide streaming media for thousands of users. > > > You can use the substring function to read the pieces you need. > Won't the substring function bring the whole thing into memory in the backend before it pass you the piece you need? Let's assume I want to stream 4k at a time of a 40mb image, that's a whole lot of byte swapping if that's the case. How do you handle writes without first creating the whole image in memory? From what I can see, the current JDBC driver uses the lo_<xxx> client api's and they seem to map to the inv_<xxx> server api's. Regards, Thomas Hallgren
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: