Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance
| От | Andrew - Supernews |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | slrne06jc3.5md.andrew+nonews@atlantis.supernews.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance ("Clark C. Evans" <cce@clarkevans.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2006-02-27, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I do have doubts about adding any large number of add-on views to
> pg_catalog, because of the privileged place of that schema in search
> paths. It'd be better to put them in a separate schema ("pg_info"
> maybe?) where they'd pose less risk of conflicts with user-defined names.
> Does newsysviews already do this?
The current version in pgfoundry CVS uses "pg_sysviews" as the schema name.
If you have any better suggestions for the name, or any other aspect of the
project, then we're all ears.
--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: