Re: Views, views, views! (long)
От | Andrew - Supernews |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Views, views, views! (long) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | slrnd7lme7.2ep3.andrew+nonews@trinity.supernews.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Views, views, views! (long) (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Views, views, views! (long)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2005-05-06, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> wrote: >> Hmmm ... we argued about this. I was in favor of hiding the OIDs >> because OIDs are not consistent after a database reload and names are. >> I can see your point though; what do other people think? > > Well phpPgAdmin is unable to use the pg_tables view, for instance, > because we have no way of getting the table comment using the > information in that view... If you look at the columns lists, you'll find that oids are exposed in a number of places. In general, I didn't make a point of exposing them everywhere, but I _did_ expose them in cases where I thought it likely that querying by or for the oid in particular might be needed. (OIDs are, after all, exposed quite a bit by the wire protocol and by libpq.) Whether the balance is correct here is something I'm open to suggestions about. -- Andrew, Supernews http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: