Re: 'infinity' in GiST index

On 2005-05-05, "Dave Held" <dave.held@arraysg.com> wrote:
> That's because you're talking about transfinite arithmetic, and
> subtraction is not defined therein.  AKA "the arithmetic of
> infinite cardinals".  I've actually seen a few different 
> formulations, some of which say that adding a finite number to
> an infinity results in a different number than the infinity, and
> some that say it is the original infinity.  However, it seems
> that the most common formulation is the latter:
>
>   w + 1 = w
>
> Where w is lower-case omega, or aleph_0.

No; you're confusing your cardinals and your ordinals. aleph_0 is a
cardinal number (the cardinality of any infinite countable set);
omega is an ordinal number. The arithmetic of transfinite ordinals is
completely different to that of cardinals; the most obvious example of
this is that addition involving transfinite ordinals is not commutative:
1 + w = w  !=  w + 1

(Think of this as follows: 1 + w represents a single item followed by an
infinite sequence; this is indistinguishable from the infinite sequence
alone. w + 1 is an infinite sequence followed by a single item; this is
not equivalent to the original sequence, so you can continue to w + 2,
w + 3, ... w + w = 2w and so on.)

In contrast the arithmetic of cardinals behaves quite differently:
a_0 + 1 = a_0a_0 + a_0 = 2 x a_0 = a_0a_0 x a_0 = a_0 ^ 2 = a_0
2 ^ a_0 = C > a_0

(A countable infinite set with an item added is still countable. Two
countable infinite sets can be counted by taking items alternately from
each. A square whose dimensions are countably infinite can be counted by
starting at any point and spiralling outwards. C, which may or may not be
a_1 but is larger than a_0, is the cardinality of the real numbers; this
is shown not to be countable, and therefore > a_0, by Cantor's famous
diagonal argument.)

But this is all irrelevent to the original question, because the 'infinity'
used in floating-point arithmetic corresponds neither to transfinite
cardinals nor transfinite ordinals, but instead is an arbitrary label with
its own rules, defined as follows in IEEE arithmetic:
 +Inf + +Inf = +Inf +Inf - +Inf = NaN +Inf + -Inf = NaN +Inf * 0    = NaN +Inf / +Inf = NaN

etc.

-- 
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services