Re: SPI bug.
От | Andrew - Supernews |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SPI bug. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | slrnd79jhj.2da6.andrew+nonews@trinity.supernews.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SPI bug. (Tzahi Fadida <tzahi_ml@myrealbox.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2005-05-01, Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> wrote: > Tzahi Fadida wrote: >> I think the solution can be either changing the FETCH_ALL to >> INT_MAX or changing the interface parameter count and subsequent usages >> to long. > > I think changing SPI_cursor_fetch() and SPI_cursor_move() to take a > "long" for the "count" parameter is the right fix for HEAD. It would > probably not be wise to backport, though, as it is probably not worth > breaking ABI compatibility for SPI during a stable release series. While you're at it, how about a way to specify WITH SCROLL for a cursor created in SPI? At the moment, SPI_cursor_open hardwires the scroll option according to the result of ExecSupportsBackwardScan. -- Andrew, Supernews http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: