Are these groups "unauthorized"?
От | Guido Ostkamp |
---|---|
Тема | Are these groups "unauthorized"? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | slrnahmmhp.1am.Guido.Ostkamp@bianca.dialin.t-online.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Are these groups "unauthorized"?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello PostgreSQL developers and Admins of news.postgresql.org, recently I located messages of this PostgreSQL groups on groups.google.com. However, after asking the local newsserver admin of my company to host those groups as well, I was told that those groups here are *unauthorized* and clearly violating current Usenet rules for the namespace of the "Big 8" hierarchies, that is "comp.*" and others, thus the hosting of the groups had to be refused. Apparently, no RfD (Request for discussion) and voting has ever been made to officially introduce those groups to the Usenet. May I kindly ask, why this procedure has not been followed? Or, if you did not intend to do that, why have the groups not been given a name outside of the forbidden namespace of the "Big 8"? I am sure, a lot of people would be happy, if those groups were officially introduced and hosted on many international newservers. Regards, Guido
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: