Re: Access 97 DB to Postgres Migration Questions
От | Ian Harding |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Access 97 DB to Postgres Migration Questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | sf17dfd0.003@mail.tpchd.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Access 97 DB to Postgres Migration Questions (Raymond <support@bigriverinfotech.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Access 97 DB to Postgres Migration Questions
Re: Access 97 DB to Postgres Migration Questions |
Список | pgsql-general |
There is a switch in the ODBC configuration under OPTIONS | DATASOURCE | PAGE 2 to use -1 as true. I think that will makeit work, although I have not tried it. >>> Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> 07/18/03 10:41AM >>> On Friday 18 July 2003 18:11, Andrew Gould wrote: > > They match up pretty much as you would expect > > int4=>long integer etc. One > > thing to watch out for is booleans - come through as > > 0/-1 in Access. > > > > Richard Huxton > > I'm dealing with this specific issue for the first > time. How do you suggest dealing with the boolean > incompatibility issue? I can't seem to make > checkboxes work; but I want to keep the pgsql boolean > datatype. Is there a way to change the value input by > checkboxes? Or do I have to go with the text input of > T, F, Y or N? I could have sworn they did work in Access, but I'm not in Windows at the moment. The issue I was talking about is that if you pass raw SQL to the database you'll want to use "T" whereas in recordsets etc you can carry on using "-1" etc. If I get back into Windows before I knock off tonight I'll have a quick check. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: