Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
Дата | |
Msg-id | s2h407d949e1005090947s7bbab437v1b2acd8a67e6b066@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > The use cases are covered as best they can be without better support from > expected future SR features like heartbeats and XID loopback. For what it's worth I think deferring these extra complications is a very useful exercise. I would like to see a system that doesn't depend on them for basic functionality. In particular I would like to see a system that can be useful using purely WAL log shipping without streaming replication at all. I'm a bit unclear how the boolean proposal would solve things though. Surely if you set the boolean to recovery-wins then when using streaming replication with any non-idle master virtually every query would be cancelled immediately as every HOT cleanup would cause a snapshot conflict with even short-lived queires in the slave. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: