Re: SQL Functions
От | Raymond Auge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL Functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | s174fcdc.066@luadmn2.laurentian.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SQL Functions (Postgres User <postgres@productivitymedia.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Hello Postgres User, I'd have to say that functions have the same "function" in SQL as they do in any language; a logical grouping of often repeatedopperations. So, if you have a repeated sequence like query1(args); if(result of query1 does this){ query2(args); } else{ query3(args); } then consider that you have 3 transactions with the database. But, if all that was put into a SQL function, you have 1 transaction; "functions in SQL are atomic". As well, in you code you have sql_function(args); and that's it... clean and very fast. -------------------------------------------------------------- Raymond Augé, B.COSC Spécialiste en médiatisation de la formation/Multimedia specialist Université Laurentienne / Laurentian University <rx_auge@laurentienne.ca> / <rx_auge@laurentian.ca> (705) 675-1151 x3934 >>> Postgres User <postgres@productivitymedia.com> 19/10/2004 11:12:47 am >>> What are the advantages to SQL Functions? I'm looking to optimize 'default' PostgreSQL environments for clients. I'm writing an application and looking to put functions to optimize just that table, etc. They don't want to have a full-time database admin (surprise!). Thanks, J ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: