Re: The database system is in recovery mode
От | dalgoda@ix.netcom.com (Mike Castle) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The database system is in recovery mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | qboooxp1b.ln2@thune.mrc-home.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | The database system is in recovery mode (Trevor Astrope <astrope@e-corp.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: The database system is in recovery mode
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
In article <20030502141444.GC13419@libertyrms.info>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info> wrote: >Neither, assuming you have good hardware and you're using fsync. WAL >is there precisely to make the system crash safe. (Of course, if >it's sitting on an ext2 partition and the system goes down hard, you >have a different batch of problems. But WAL+fsync protects you from >postmaster crashes, and machine crashes if your filesystem is >crash-safe.) You seem to be implying that ext2+fsync is not machine crash safe. Is this really what you are trying to say? If so, could you point to docs that verify that? I could definitely see where ext2 without fsync would leave the system in an strange state, but with fsync it should be fine. mrc -- Mike Castle dalgoda@ix.netcom.com www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: