Re: GSOC PostgreSQL partitioning issue
От | Joseph Adams |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GSOC PostgreSQL partitioning issue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | q2ue7e5fefd1004091728yb199cf79u717cb93ee7a415af@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GSOC PostgreSQL partitioning issue (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> wrote: > I guess a GSoC of reasonable size would be to define a spec for how to > implement partitioning in PostgreSQL with a sound and accepted proposal > on independent steps to contribute separately, in order to reach the > full implementation in an incremental fashion and by different hackers. > > Then you could pick up one of those items. By then I mean after the > summary and the plan both have been accepted by core people and by > contributors who said in the past they wanted to spend precious hours on > the topic. > > But I don't know if a GSoC can be completed without even coding. According to the link below, GSoC proposals for documentation aren't accepted. This probably extends to other non-coding work as well. http://socghop.appspot.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2010/faqs#doc_proposals
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: