Re: extended operator classes vs. type interfaces

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Nathan Boley <npboley@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The advantage of specifying a + and a - in the type interface is that
>>> the unit definition can then be specified as part of the type
>>> declaration itself.  So you can do:
>>>
>>> CREATE TYPE ts_sec AS RANGE OVER timestamp (UNIT = '1s');
>>> CREATE TYPE ts_min AS RANGE OVER timestamp (UNIT = '1m');
>>>
>>> All of the stuff about defining + and - is hidden from the user - it's
>>> part of the type interface, which is pre-created.
>>
>> The disadvantage is that it does not permit irregularly spaced units.
>
> True.  The only types I can think of that have irregularly spaced
> units would be things based on floating points, and I was assuming
> that people would only want continuous intervals on those.  If someone
> really wants to be able to deduce that [1.0,3.0) = [1.0,3.0-epsilon),
> then we need a different design.  But I find it hard to believe that's
> very useful.  Maybe you feel otherwise?

Er, that [1.0,3.0) = [1.0,3.0-epsilon], rather.

...Robert