Re: Top n queries and GROUP BY
От | Harald Fuchs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Top n queries and GROUP BY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | pusmkl627a.fsf@srv.protecting.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Top n queries and GROUP BY (Rich Cullingford <rculling@sysd.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
In article <3FB8F98D.1010707@sysd.com>, Rich Cullingford <rculling@sysd.com> writes: > All, > This is a straight SQL question, maybe not appropriate for a performance > list, but... > I have a simple stock holdings setup: > => select * from t1; > nam | co | num > -----+-----------+------ > joe | ibm | 600 > abe | ibm | 1500 > joe | cisco | 1200 > abe | cisco | 800 > joe | novell | 500 > joe | microsoft | 200 > What I would like to see is a Top-n-holdings-by-name", e.g, for n=2: > nam | co | num > ----------+--------+----- > joe | cisco | 1200 > joe | ibm | 600 > abe | ibm | 1500 > abe | cisco | 800 > I can get part of the way by using a LIMIT clause in a subquery, e.g, > => select 'abe', a.co, a.num from (select co, num from t1 where > nam='abe' order by num desc limit 2) as a; > ?column? | co | num > ----------+-------+------ > abe | ibm | 1500 > abe | cisco | 800 > but I can't figure out a correlated subquery (or GROUP BY arrangement or > anything else) that will cycle through the names. I vaguely remember > that these kinds or queries are hard to do in standard SQL, but I was > hoping that PG, with its extensions... How about an outer join? SELECT x1.nam, x1.co, x1.num FROM t1 x1 LEFT JOIN t1 x2 ON x2.nam = x1.nam AND x2.num > x1.num GROUP BY x1.nam, x1.co, x1.num HAVING count(*) < 2 ORDER BY x1.nam, x1.num DESC
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: